Pfizer Is Calling the Pictures to Jab Children


In late February 2021, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported1 that Pfizer was demanding international locations put up sovereign property as collateral for anticipated vaccine harm lawsuits ensuing from its COVID-19 inoculation. Whereas at the very least two international locations, Argentina and Brazil, initially rejected the calls for, calling them abusive, many others accepted Pfizer’s phrases from the beginning.

Public Citizen has now reviewed and revealed the key contracts2,3 between Pfizer and Albania, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Dominican Republic, the European Fee, Peru, the U.S. and the U.Ok. These contracts reveal nations have handed over unprecedented energy to Pfizer. In nearly all situations, Pfizer’s pursuits come first.

Pfizer Is Calling the Pictures

Public Citizen factors out six methods through which nations are permitting Pfizer to name the pictures. For instance, Albania, Brazil and Colombia have handed over unilateral authority to the corporate for the supply schedule and different key choices. As reported by Public Citizen:4

“As a situation to getting into into the settlement, the Colombian authorities is required to ‘display, in a way passable to Suppliers, that Suppliers and their associates can have satisfactory safety, as decided in Suppliers’ sole discretion’ … from legal responsibility claims.

Colombia is required to certify to Pfizer the worth of the contingent obligations (i.e., potential future legal responsibility), and to start out appropriating funds to cowl the contingent obligations, in accordance with a contribution program.”

Pfizer additionally maintains tight management over vaccine provides, and dictates who can purchase their vaccine, when, and who can provide and obtain vaccine donations. If there are shortages, Pfizer decides which international locations get precedence.

Bypassing Pfizer might be pricey. For instance, if Brazil have been to simply accept vaccine donations from one other nation with out Pfizer’s approval, the corporate can terminate the contract and drive Brazil to pay the total prize for all remaining contracted doses. In the meantime, Pfizer incurs no penalty if its supply is late, even when it is so late that the pictures are now not wanted.

Some international locations, together with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, additionally ended up agreeing to Pfizer’s demand to place up sovereign property as collateral for vaccine harm lawsuits, together with financial institution reserves, navy bases and embassy buildings.

Briefly, theses governments are guaranteeing Pfizer can be compensated for any bills ensuing from harm lawsuits towards it, so the corporate will not lose a dime if its COVID shot injures individuals — even when these accidents are the results of negligent firm practices, fraud or malice!

On the similar time, authorities purchasers should acknowledge that the effectiveness and security of the pictures are utterly unknown. That is the final word company maleficence, utilizing their leverage to drive the kill shot down these international locations’ throats and avoiding any private accountability for damages.

Secret Arbitration

The contracts additionally dictate how contractual disputes can be settled. As reported by Public Citizen:5

“What occurs if the UK can’t resolve a contractual dispute with Pfizer? A secret panel of three non-public arbitrators — not a U.Ok courtroom — is empowered underneath the contract to make the ultimate choice. The arbitration is carried out underneath the Guidelines of Arbitration of the Worldwide Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Each events are required to maintain every little thing secret:

‘The Events conform to hold confidential the existence of the arbitration, the arbitral proceedings, the submissions made by the Events and the selections made by the arbitral tribunal, together with its awards, besides as required by Legislation and to the extent not already within the public area.’

The Albania draft contract and Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, and Peru agreements require the governments to go additional, with contractual disputes topic to ICC arbitration making use of New York legislation. Whereas ICC arbitration involving states isn’t unusual, disputes involving high-income international locations and/or prescribed drugs seem like comparatively uncommon …

Non-public arbitration displays an imbalance of energy. It permits pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer to bypass home authorized processes. This consolidates company energy and undermines the rule of legislation.”

Pfizer Secured Mental Property Rights

Amazingly, the contracts not solely safe Pfizer’s mental property rights, however ought to Pfizer be discovered responsible of stealing the mental property rights of others, a number of the contracts shift the accountability away from Pfizer onto the federal government purchasers! What this implies is that Pfizer can steal the mental property of others with out consequence in at the very least 4 international locations.

“For instance, if one other vaccine maker sued Pfizer for patent infringement in Colombia, the contract requires the Colombian authorities to foot the invoice,” Public Citizen writes.6 “Pfizer additionally explicitly says that it doesn’t assure that its product doesn’t violate third-party IP, or that it wants extra licenses.

Pfizer takes no accountability in these contracts for its potential infringement of mental property. In a way, Pfizer has secured an IP waiver for itself. However internationally, Pfizer is combating related efforts to waive IP obstacles for all producers.”

Pfizer Given Proper to Silence Authorities

Maybe most egregious of all, a number of the contracts give Pfizer the precise to muzzle authorities. In Brazil, authorities officers are prohibited from making “any public announcement regarding the existence, material or phrases of [the] Settlement” with out the written consent of the corporate.

The gag order additionally consists of commenting on the federal government’s relationship with Pfizer basically. Comparable nondisclosure provisions are included within the contracts with the European Fee and the U.S. authorities. The one distinction, Public Citizen notes, is that the nondisclosure guidelines apply to each events.

Pfizer Can Forestall Use of Different Cures

Equally surprising, although, is that international locations are compelled to observe by way of on their vaccine orders even when different medicine or remedies emerge that may forestall, deal with or treatment COVID-19.7 Is it any surprise, then, that governments all over the world have suppressed the usage of medicine like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?

If these medicine have been allowed for use and might be confirmed to work, the COVID injections can be utterly pointless, but governments are on the hook for lots of of thousands and thousands of doses. Whereas COVID-19 vaccines are “free” to obtain within the U.S., they’re being paid for by taxpayer {dollars} at a charge of $19.50 per dose. In Albania, the price of every dose is $12, and within the EU, $14.70.

Within the case of the value disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is claimed to have given a value break to the EU as a result of it financially supported the event of their COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer — Grasp of Catastrophe Profiteering


going broke tweet

>>>>> Click on Right here <<<<<

As famous Public Citizen, Pfizer is being allowed to revenue from this self-inflicted international catastrophe in unprecedented methods. In lots of situations, a nation’s legal guidelines is not going to apply to Pfizer.

These secret contracts grant Pfizer complete management over its product and ensures full fee, no matter whether or not the pictures are wanted or usable, whereas concurrently eliminating all legal responsibility. Briefly, Pfizer wins, it doesn’t matter what the result of the vaccination marketing campaign may be.

On the similar time, Pfizer can be controlling media by way of its promoting {dollars}. As you’ve got in all probability realized by now, media corporations in most situations is not going to report on something that may jeopardize the earnings of its advertisers.

As illustrated within the quick video above, it could not be extra apparent that Pfizer is bankrolling the media, which in flip will refuse to chew the hand that feeds it. You possibly can see the broad spectrum of media programming being sponsored by Pfizer, together with “Nightline,” “Making a Distinction,” “CNN Tonight,” “Early Begin,” “Erin Burnett Out Entrance,” “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” “CBS Sports activities,” “Meet the Press,” “CBS This Morning” and “60 Minutes.”

Pfizer Research Reveals Elevated Mortality

The phrases of those contracts are all of the extra disturbing when you think about how harmful the Pfizer shot is popping out to be. No surprise the corporate refused to simply accept any legal responsibility.

As proven within the video above, Episode 3 in “The False Narrative Takedown Sequence”8 by Steve Kirsch, Pfizer’s personal Section 3 six-month trial9 confirmed the pictures elevated all-cause mortality. Extra individuals really died within the therapy group than within the placebo group.

In response to Pfizer’s personal information, one COVID loss of life per 20,000 absolutely vaccinated people is prevented. Which means 10,000 lives are saved if 200 million are absolutely vaccinated.

However what number of lives are misplaced from the pictures? That is the opposite facet of the equation that merely calls for to be analyzed earlier than any governmental authority can decide as as to if the mass vaccination marketing campaign is of profit or not.

Right here, we discover that Pfizer’s information10 present the pictures are literally killing greater than they save. To have a look at this info your self, click on on “Supplementary Materials” on the right-hand facet of the paper, then, beside Supplementary Appendix, click on on dietary supplements/261159 and scroll right down to web page 12, Desk S4.

Within the vaccine group, 15 died; within the placebo group 14 died. Two individuals died from COVID-19 within the placebo group, whereas just one died from COVID pneumonia within the vaccine group. That is the way you get a internet false constructive impression — one life is spared from COVID. Nevertheless, the all-cause mortality was really greater within the vaccine group (15, in comparison with 14).

So, whereas the pictures saved one particular person from dying from COVID, additionally they killed one further particular person. So, the online impact is nil. There is not any mortality profit in any respect. Different investigations utilizing completely different information strongly recommend the online impact is profoundly destructive, and the pictures are doing FAR extra hurt than good.

We Face Looming Vaccine-Induced Public Well being Disaster

For this, Kirsch cites a paper11 by Dr. Bart Classen, revealed within the August 2021 concern of the journal Developments in Inside Medication. Classen factors out that Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are all utilizing a “dangerously deceptive” scientific trial design. The issue is that they are all utilizing a surrogate endpoint for well being, particularly “extreme infections with COVID-19.”

Illness particular main endpoints are now not utilized in many fields of drugs, for the truth that it may cover issues. If an individual dies from the therapy or is severely injured by it, even when the therapy helped block the development of the illness they’re being handled for, the top consequence remains to be a destructive one.

Because of this, the suitable endpoint that must be used is all-cause mortality and morbidity. When Classen reexamined the scientific trial information from all three producers utilizing all-cause extreme morbidity because the endpoint, a disturbing image emerged.

As defined by Classen in his paper, “US COVID-19 Vaccines Confirmed to Trigger Extra Hurt than Good Primarily based on Pivotal Scientific Trial Information Analyzed Utilizing the Correct Scientific Endpoint, ‘All Trigger Extreme Morbidity'”:12

“‘All-cause extreme morbidity’ within the therapy group and management group was calculated by including all extreme occasions reported within the scientific trials. Extreme occasions included each extreme infections with COVID-19 and all different extreme adversarial occasions within the therapy arm and management arm respectively.

This evaluation provides discount in extreme COVID-19 infections the identical weight as adversarial occasions of equal severity. Outcomes show that not one of the vaccines present a well being profit and all pivotal trials present a statistically vital improve in ‘all-cause extreme morbidity’ within the vaccinated group in comparison with the placebo group.

The Moderna immunized group suffered 3,042 extra extreme occasions than the management group. The Pfizer information was grossly incomplete however information supplied confirmed the vaccination group suffered 90 extra extreme occasions than the management group, when solely together with ‘unsolicited’ adversarial occasions.

The Janssen immunized group suffered 264 extra extreme occasions than the management group. These findings distinction the producers’ inappropriate surrogate endpoints:

Janssen claims that their vaccine prevents 6 instances of extreme COVID-19 requiring medical consideration out of 19,630 immunized; Pfizer claims their vaccine prevents 8 instances of extreme COVID-19 out of 21,720 immunized; Moderna claims its vaccine prevents 30 instances of extreme COVID-19 out of 15,210 immunized.

Primarily based on this information it’s all however a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the well being of the inhabitants basically. Scientific ideas dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines should be halted instantly as a result of we face a looming vaccine induced public well being disaster.”

To make the above numbers extra clear and apparent, listed here are the prevention stats in percentages:

  • Pfizer 0.00036%
  • Moderna 0.00125%
  • Janssen 0.00030%

CDC Claims COVID Pictures Decrease All-Trigger Mortality

Regardless of all of that, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention now claims Individuals “vaccinated” towards COVID-19 have decrease all-cause mortality charges.13 As reported by Forbes:14

“Partially and absolutely vaccinated individuals died from non-coronavirus causes at a decrease charge than their unvaccinated friends, in accordance with the examine,15 which checked out thousands and thousands of sufferers at seven U.S. well being organizations from December to July.

All three vaccines authorized by U.S. regulators have been tied to decrease non-COVID loss of life charges, although the distinction in mortality amongst individuals who took Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine was barely smaller than for recipients of Pfizer or Moderna’s vaccines …

This consequence suggests the vaccines do not improve a affected person’s danger of loss of life, which ‘reinforces the security profile of at the moment authorized COVID-19 vaccines,’ the examine stated.”

FDA Approves Jab for Younger Youngsters


techno fog tweet

>>>>> Click on Right here <<<<<

October 26, 2021, the FDA unanimously voted to grant emergency use approval of the COVID pictures for kids between the ages of 5 and 11.16 This regardless of acknowledging they do not know what the long-term danger to youngsters may be. As famous by one voting member, “We’re by no means going to find out about how secure the vaccine is till we begin giving it.”17

All we now have at current is 2 Pfizer trials, one through which 5- to 11-year-olds have been adopted for 2 months and one other with simply six weeks of follow-up. Each have been too small to detect potential dangers similar to myocarditis. That will not be studied till AFTER the shot is allowed for kids. As reported by The Defender:18

“Consultants raised considerations over the dearth of security and efficacy information offered by Pfizer to be used of its COVID vaccine in youthful youngsters, they usually pointed to growing security alerts primarily based on stories to the Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS). Additionally they questioned the necessity to vaccinate youngsters — whose danger of dying from COVID is “virtually nil” — in any respect.

In response to Dr. Meryl Nass, member of the Youngsters’s Well being Protection Scientific Advisory Panel, Pfizer as soon as once more didn’t use all the youngsters who participated within the trial of their security examine.

‘Three thousand youngsters obtained Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, however solely 750 youngsters have been selectively included within the firm’s security evaluation,’ Nass stated.

‘Research within the 5-11 age group are basically the identical because the 12-15 group — in different phrases, equally temporary and unsatisfying, with insufficient security information and efficacy information, with no sturdy assist for why the sort of immuno-bridging evaluation is adequate … All severe adversarial occasions have been thought of unrelated to the vaccine’ …

Dr. Jessica Rose, viral immunologist and biologist, instructed the panel EUA of organic brokers requires the existence of an emergency and the nonexistence of alternate therapy. ‘There isn’t any emergency and COVID-19 is exceedingly treatable,’ Rose stated.

In a peer-reviewed examine19 co-authored by Rose, myocarditis charges have been considerably greater in individuals 13 to 23 years outdated inside eight weeks of the COVID vaccine rollout. In 12- to15-year-olds, Rose stated, reported instances of myocarditis have been 19 occasions greater than background charges …

Rose stated tens of hundreds of stories have been submitted to VAERS for kids ages 0 to 18. Rose defined: ‘On this age group, 60 youngsters have died — 23 of them have been lower than 2 years outdated. It’s disturbing to notice that ‘product administered to affected person of inappropriate age’ was filed 5,510 occasions on this age group. Two youngsters have been inappropriately injected, presumably by a educated medical skilled, and subsequently died.'”

In the course of the assembly, Dr. Cody Meissner famous we do not know whether or not the shot is secure for this age group, and the danger of COVID is extraordinarily low. If the shot is allowed, mandates will seemingly observe, which might be “dangerous.”


justin hart tweet

>>>>> Click on Right here <<<<<

Brownstone Institute can be objecting to the authorization. In an October 20, 2021, article,20 Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., a former assistant professor of evidence-based medication and analysis strategies, known as the plan to vaccinate younger youngsters “completely reckless” and “harmful primarily based on lack of security information and poor analysis methodology.”

In the meantime, information present not a single youngster has died from COVID-19 who didn’t have a severe underlying well being situation. Alexander critiques a whole lot of that information in his article.

Staggering Conflicts of Curiosity

If you have a look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members21 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for kids as younger as 5, the unanimous “sure” vote turns into much less of a thriller. As reported by Nationwide File,22 they’ve staggering conflicts of curiosity. Members embody:

Gregg Sylvester — A former vp of Pfizer Vaccines

Arnold S. Monto — A paid Pfizer guide

Archana Chatterjee — A current Pfizer analysis grant recipient

Myron Levine — Mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine analysis and improvement at Pfizer

James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical School, which administers Pfizer vaccines

Geeta Swamy — Chair of the Unbiased Information Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program

Steven Pergam — Proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine

A number of people who find themselves already on the file supporting coronavirus vaccines for kids, together with Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton

Along with that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is at the moment on Pfizer’s board of administrators.

FDA Buries Information on Severely Injured Youngsters

With these pictures now being pushed on younger youngsters, it is extra crucial than ever to grasp how information are being massaged and manipulated to assist the continuing lunacy. Of specific concern is proof that the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration is burying information on youngsters who have been severely injured within the vaccine trials. As reported by Aaron Siri on Substack:23

“Pfizer’s scientific trial for kids aged 12-15 included only one,131 youngsters who have been vaccinated and at the very least a type of youngsters suffered a devastating, life-altering harm which, regardless of incontrovertible proof and the cries of each the sufferer and her mother and father, has not been appropriately acknowledged by Pfizer or the FDA.

Placing apart that one severe harm in a small trial ought to alone elevate blaring alarm bells, one should ask: what different severe adversarial occasions have been hidden and ignored by regulators?”

Siri tells the story of 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, who alongside together with her two brothers have been enrolled by her mother and father in Pfizer’s scientific trial. That call has modified the lives of the complete household, probably perpetually. Inside 24 hours of her second dose, Maddie suffered crippling ache and systemic accidents.

Maddie is now wheelchair-bound and requires a feeding tube. Pfizer’s principal investigator initially claimed Maddie’s accidents have been unrelated to the shot and handled her as a psychological affected person. Finally, her harm was listed as “purposeful stomach ache” in Pfizer’s report back to the FDA.

“For a virus that not often harms youngsters, the necessity to guarantee security of the Covid-19 vaccine is excessive. A examine with only one,131 youngsters is underpowered. It is not going to choose up something however the commonest adversarial occasions.

If what Maddie suffered will happen in 1/1,000 youngsters, that may end in 75,000 youngsters on this nation struggling this severe harm. If it occurs 1/10,000 youngsters, that’s 7,500 struggling this severe harm.

It might be that the treatment is worse than the illness. However that can solely be recognized if there’s a correctly powered (a.ok.a., sized) scientific trial with youngsters,” Siri writes, including that:

“Worldwide scientists have declared that ‘inadequately powered research ought to themselves be thought of a breach of moral requirements.’24 And not using a scientific trial of adequate dimension that critiques all potential adversarial occasions, similar to that skilled by Maddie, for a adequate period, this probably catastrophic consequence is not going to be recognized previous to authorization or licensure …

The actual lesson isn’t that pharmaceutical corporations, or the FDA ought to act higher or do a greater job. That simply will not all the time be the case. The actual lesson is that civil and particular person rights ought to by no means be contingent upon a medical process. By no means.

Preserving these rights to decide on whether or not to get a medical product, with none authorities coercion, is the ultimate and supreme safeguard.

Eradicating that proper leads to harmful authoritarianism as a result of simply because the FDA is not going to admit to Maddie’s severe harm after having promoted this vaccine, politicians that mandate the vaccine is not going to need to later admit a mistake by repealing the mandate.”

FDA Sued to Entry COVID Jab Trial Information

We’re now able the place it is near-impossible for a lot of to refuse the COVID jab, and if injured, they can not sue anybody for damages. Including insult to harm, we do not even have entry to all the info governments are supposedly counting on to mandate these hazardous merchandise.

To deal with this final level, a corporation known as Public Well being and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) is now suing25 the FDA after the company refused to launch the info on which it primarily based its choice to approve Comirnaty.26

The FDA denied the PHMPT request for expedited processing of its Freedom of Data Act (FOIA) request on the idea that no “imminent menace to the life or bodily security of a person” existed. Per the grievance:27

“… in an effort to make sure that the FDA acts in furtherance of its dedication to transparency, PHMPT seeks to acquire the info and knowledge relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer Vaccine.

The significance of releasing to the general public this info can be acknowledged underneath federal legislation which offers that: ‘After a license has been issued, the next information and knowledge within the organic product file are instantly accessible for public disclosure until extraordinary circumstances are proven: (1) All security and effectiveness information and knowledge. (2) A protocol for a take a look at or examine …'”

‘Simply Say No’ to the COVID Shot

Whereas U.S. authorities are doing their finest to cover incriminating information and manipulating the remaining to point out some kind of profit, widespread sense, medical info and accessible information all level in the other way. It is crystal clear to me that youngsters don’t want the COVID shot, as their danger of significant COVID-19 an infection and loss of life is nearly nonexistent.

However, youngsters are fairly prone to be severely injured by these injections. The rationale you are not getting the reality from the media is defined by Dr. Peter McCullough within the video above. Briefly, it is a deliberate propaganda marketing campaign — “the promotion of false info by the individuals in cost.”

In response to McCullough, anybody underneath the age of fifty has a lower than 1% likelihood of a nasty end result if they arrive down with COVID-19. “Why would you are taking the vaccine?” he asks. “My recommendation,” he says, “is simply say no to this [shot], particularly younger people who find themselves not in danger.”

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Everythingplaza
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0
Shopping cart