What You Must Know In regards to the COVID Shot, and Extra

Within the video presentation above, Dr. Peter McCullough, a extremely credentialed and printed heart specialist, internist and epidemiologist, and one of many major physicians main the cost to supply commonsense scientific knowledge into COVID remedies, explains what the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is and the way it harms human biology — whether or not it comes from a pure SARS-CoV-2 an infection or a COVID jab.

The presentation was given on the Burleson, Texas, COVID Symposium: A Authorized Perspective, which streamed reside December 3, 2021. He begins by addressing the need for security each time a brand new biologic product is launched. Security shouldn’t be one thing we are able to merely ignore, it doesn’t matter what else is at stake. We should demand that no matter we’re given really meets some sort of security commonplace.

Warning bells began ringing in McCullough’s ears in the summertime of 2020, lengthy earlier than the COVID pictures have been rolled out. “I used to be telling lawmakers that we’ve acquired an issue,” McCullough says, as a result of corners have been being minimize which may lead to a harmful product. Security research, for instance, have been truncated all the way down to a mere two months, which doesn’t enable for ample analysis.

Why Did They Use Spike Protein?

He additionally had a number of different issues in regards to the growth program. Notably, the pictures have been based mostly on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which by then we already realized is essentially the most pathogenic a part of the virus, chargeable for the worst signs of COVID-19, such because the irregular blood clotting seen in severely unwell sufferers.

As defined by McCullough, the virus could be illustrated as a ball with spike-like protrusions on its floor. These spikes are what’s inflicting the issues.

“They’d been genetically altered and engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China” McCullough says, “to be significantly infectious, and to be significantly harmful once they get into the human physique.

The very last thing you need in your physique is a type of [spike proteins], not to mention billions of them as a result of [they] harm the mind, they harm the center, they harm bone marrow, they’ll tear up platelets and purple blood cells. Very importantly, they harm blood vessels and trigger blood clotting.”

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA pictures, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic materials into your physique that applications your cells to start out producing the spike protein. They’re gene switch applied sciences.

Briefly, the pictures instruct your physique to supply a harmful protein inside its personal tissues. “We’ve by no means finished that earlier than within the historical past of medication,” McCullough says, and for good motive: It’s a foul thought. “It’s virtually like a science fiction story going unhealthy,” he says.

The thought is that by making your physique produce this damaging spike protein, your physique will react and struggle it off, thereby creating immunity. Nevertheless, within the course of, the spike protein can do near-incomprehensible harm. In some folks, the spike protein is deadly.

Uncontrolled Spike Protein Manufacturing

What’s extra, we now have uncontrolled manufacturing of spike protein, each by way of amount and time. The Could 2021 paper,1 “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected within the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” proved the spike protein circulated within the blood stream for a median of 15 days’ post-injection. The longest was 29 days.

This refuted the declare that the mRNA merely stayed within the arm and didn’t flow into out of the injection website. Logically, that declare doesn’t make a lot sense, and the Japanese authorities, early on, demanded Pfizer do a examine to point out them the place the injected mRNA really goes.

Pfizer did that biodistribution examine,2 which confirmed each the mRNA and spike protein have been extensively distributed in animals’ our bodies. Specifically, it was discovered to build up within the ovaries. Regardless of that, the Pfizer biodistribution knowledge bundle reveals reproductive toxicology research have been eradicated within the curiosity of pace.

June 25, 2021, a paper was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv, exhibiting the S1 portion of the spike protein stays detectable for as much as 15 months after you recuperate from COVID-19.

“No marvel folks have long-COVID syndrome,” McCullough says. “The physique is attempting to scrub out this spike protein that’s not purported to be there, 15 months after you’ve had the an infection.”

McCullough factors out that Bruce Patterson, the Stanford scientist who led that examine, additionally continues to seek out the entire spike protein — each the S1 and S2 segments — in sufferers who acquired the COVID jab, months post-injection.

So, as of proper now, we don’t know when the spike protein manufacturing ceases. What we do know, with nice certainty, is that the spike protein damages the human physique and contributes to each acute and power well being situations and illnesses.

Australia has already bought 14 doses of the COVID jabs for each particular person. That is meant to cowl them for seven years, at one dose each six months. As famous by McCullough, some folks merely aren’t going to outlive that sort of steady and ever-increasing onslaught of spike protein.

Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security

Clear hazard indicators have been obvious in April 2021, and Could 24, 2021, McCullough printed a paper together with 56 different worldwide scientists within the journal Authorea.3

The paper, “SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security that Demand Solutions from Worldwide Well being Companies, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Builders,” demanded the injections be pulled from the market until or till security issues are addressed. Key scientific issues raised embody:

The doubtless hazardous mechanisms of motion of the pictures leading to cell, tissue and organ harm

The presence of dangerous spike protein in donated blood

Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity research

The results of bioaccumulation in ladies’s ovaries

The potential for lowered fertility

The shortage of a knowledge and security monitoring board (DSMB) to supervise scientific trials and post-market surveillance

The shortage of human ethics committee to supervise scientific trials

The shortage of restrictions on exempted teams from randomized managed trials (RCTs) similar to pregnant ladies, ladies of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (beforehand immune)

The shortage of danger stratification for hospitalization and dying within the scientific trials

The shortage of knowledge transparency

The shortage of public danger mitigation (early and at-home remedy choices)

The paper was despatched to each well being and regulatory company on the planet. Right here we’re in early 2022 and, properly, you’ll be able to see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.

A Vital Appraisal of VAERS

In October 2021, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., with the Institute for Pure and Utilized Data in Israel, printed a report within the Science, Public Well being Coverage, and the Regulation journal.4 The report, “Vital Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the US Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” particulars three major issues discovered:

  1. Deleted hostile occasion stories involving COVID jab accidents
  2. Delayed entry of stories
  3. Recoding of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Actions (MeDRA) phrases from extreme to gentle

It additionally consists of bar plots exhibiting the acute distinction between the COVID pictures in comparison with all different vaccines in the marketplace. If the pictures have been secure, the variety of VAERS stories would stay comparatively regular, not various a lot from earlier years, however what we see is a staggering spike in vaccine accidents reported in 2021.

The typical variety of hostile occasion stories following vaccination for the previous 10 years has been about 39,000 yearly, with a median of 155 deaths. That’s for all accessible vaccines mixed.

The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 hostile occasions in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, together with 9,476 deaths. When you embody worldwide stories that make their approach into the VAERS system, we’re taking a look at 983,756 hostile occasion stories and 20,622 deaths.5

As staggering as these numbers are, they’re simply the tip of the iceberg. While you add within the underreporting issue, which is believed to be anyplace from 5 to 40, the numbers are merely astronomical.

VAERS is an early warning system and is meant to alert our authorities to probably hazardous vaccines as soon as they’ve been rolled out. The sign from VAERS is so clear there’s merely little doubt we now have a security downside on our fingers.

Can COVID Pictures Trigger Dying?

As famous by McCullough, there’s a really tight temporality to the pictures in most deaths. Half have occurred inside 48 hours of injection, and 80% have died inside one week of their jab (be it the primary, second or third dose).6

Temporality is without doubt one of the 10 Bradford Hill standards used to ascertain causal relationship. In an effort to be causative, one occasion should happen earlier than one other, and the shorter the length between the 2 occasions, the upper the chance of a causative impact.

In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., on the College of London printed an evaluation7 of VAERS dying stories concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths could possibly be attributed to the pictures. There was no different rationalization for the deaths. McLachlan additionally checked out who’s getting killed by the pictures and, sadly, it’s the identical folks the pictures are meant to guard — our seniors.

In September 2021, Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., printed a report8 that additionally confirmed seniors have been dying from the jab at far increased charges than different age teams. As famous by McCullough, this makes excellent sense as a result of folks die from COVID-19 as a result of influence of the spike protein. Why would anybody assume they are going to survive having it produced in their very own our bodies?

Utilizing the best-case situation cost-benefit evaluation, Kostoff estimates that individuals aged 65 and older are 5 occasions extra prone to die of the COVID shot than from COVID-19 itself.

The rationale for it’s because when you take the shot, you’re assured to be uncovered to its dangers, however you’re not assured to get COVID-19 when you don’t take the shot. You could be uncovered, or you might not. And never everybody develops a extreme an infection even when instantly uncovered.

COVID Jab-Related Myocarditis in Kids

In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an evaluation9 of VAERS knowledge on the preprint server medRxiv, exhibiting that greater than 86% of the youngsters aged 12 to 17 who reported signs of myocarditis have been extreme sufficient to require hospitalization.

In addition they concluded that wholesome boys have a “significantly increased” probability of being hospitalized with myocarditis post-jab than they’re of requiring hospitalization for COVID-19.

In line with McCullough, the FDA has heard these knowledge twice in 2021 and by no means disputed them. But they’ve proceeded with suggestions to present the COVID jab to anybody with a pulse over the age of 5. It’s simply stunning. Traditionally, as a rule, we’ve by no means given medication to folks once they’re extra prone to hurt than present a profit.

What Hoeg et. al.10 confirmed is that instances of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally have an effect on boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis stories are males, and 85% of stories occurred after the second dose. In line with Hoeg et. al.:11

“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] amongst boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence amongst boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs amongst ladies was 13 per million in each age teams.

The incidence of CAEs was significantly decrease after the primary dose throughout all age and intercourse teams. Median peak troponin was 5.2 ng/mL amongst boys aged 12-15 years, 11.6 ng/mL amongst boys aged 16-17 years, 0.8 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 12-15 years, and seven.3 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 16-17 years.”

Troponin Ranges Reveal Large Coronary heart Injury

Troponin is a protein that helps regulate contractions of your coronary heart and skeletal muscular tissues. It’s a biomarker for coronary heart harm, as your coronary heart releases troponin in response to an harm. Elevated troponin is used to evaluate whether or not you’ve had a coronary heart assault, for instance.

Regular troponin ranges are almost undetectable, so even small will increase can point out coronary heart harm. A stage above 0.4 ng/mL is often indicative of a coronary heart assault and something between 0.04 ng/mL and 0.4 ng/mL signifies there’s some sort of downside with the center.12

So, the sky excessive post-jab troponin ranges in these adolescent boys is something however inconsequential. It might completely be life-threatening. Myocarditis may end up in sudden dying, as illustrated in an October 2021 case report13 from Korea, the place the dying of a 22-year-old man from acute myocarditis was causally linked to the Pfizer shot.

“Undoubtedly, it’ll kill children,” McCullough says. Even when not acutely deadly, myocarditis can considerably decrease your life expectancy. Traditionally, the three- to five-year survival price for myocarditis has ranged from 56% to 83%.14 Meaning a sure proportion don’t make it previous 5 years as a result of their coronary heart is simply too broken.

McCullough and Rose have additionally tried to publish an evaluation on this matter. They submitted a paper15 on myocarditis instances in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Present Issues in Cardiology. However after initially accepting the paper, the journal all of the sudden modified its thoughts.

You possibly can nonetheless discover the pre-proof on Rose’s web site although. What they present is that post-jab myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the chance will get increased the youthful you might be. They too discovered there’s a dose-dependent danger, with boys having a six-fold higher danger of myocarditis following the second dose.

Mortality in Adolescents Is Skyrocketing

McCullough’s assertion that the shot will kill some youngsters can be beginning to present in statistics. British knowledge, for instance, reveals deaths amongst youngsters have spiked since that age group grew to become eligible for the COVID pictures.16

Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths have been reported amongst 15- to 19-year-olds. Throughout that very same time interval in 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s a rise of 47%, which has but to be defined.

Deaths from COVID-19 additionally went up amongst 15- to 19-year-olds after the pictures have been rolled out. Important issues have been raised in regards to the risk that COVID jabs may worsen COVID-19 illness through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s happening right here? As reported by The Exposé, which performed the investigation:18

“Correlation doesn’t equal causation, however this can be very regarding to see that deaths have elevated by 47% amongst teenagers over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have additionally elevated amongst this age group since they began receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it’s maybe one coincidence too far.”

COVID Jabs Double Threat of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Apart from troponin ranges, researchers have additionally discovered Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 pictures dramatically improve different biomarkers related to thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and different vascular occasions following injection.19

Individuals who had acquired two doses of the mRNA jab greater than doubled their five-year danger of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers discovered, driving it from a median of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella time period that features not solely coronary heart assaults, but in addition a spread of different situations involving abruptly lowered blood circulate to your coronary heart.

In Months, the Jabs’ Effectiveness Wanes to Zero

As must be evident by now, there are vital dangers to those COVID pictures. However what in regards to the profit facet of the equation? As famous by McCullough, whereas the pictures cut back the chance of dying from COVID-19, the profit is vanishingly small.

Quite a lot of papers have been printed calculating absolutely the danger discount of the pictures, exhibiting the 4 accessible COVID jabs within the U.S. present an absolute danger discount between simply 0.7% and 1.3%.20,21

McCullough goes on to quote a December 1, 2021, New England Journal of Medication examine22 that in contrast the effectiveness of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections amongst hospitalized veterans. Right here too, they discovered that the pictures had an effectiveness of lower than 1% towards all COVID-19 occasions, over the course of six months.

As of the tip of October 2021, we had 22 research exhibiting the pictures’ efficacy towards all variants quickly wane over the course of three to 6 months, finally hitting zero.

For instance, a Swedish examine23 printed October 25, 2021, checked out knowledge from 842,974 pairs, the place every one that had acquired two COVID jabs was paired and in contrast towards an unvaccinated particular person, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic instances and hospitalizations.

Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have respectable safety, however that rapidly modified. The Pfizer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 by 30, to 47% at Day 121 by 180, and nil from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had an analogous trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward.

The AstraZeneca injection had a decrease effectiveness out of the gate, waned quicker than the mRNA pictures, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121. All of the whereas, hundreds of thousands of Individuals have already had COVID24 and have pure immunity that doesn’t wane on this method.

“Vaccines aren’t viable if they’ll’t final a yr!” McCullough exclaims. “The minimal standards to just accept a vaccine … is 50% protection and it should final one yr. These [COVID shots] aren’t reducing it. None of them are viable to be industrial merchandise.”

The COVID-Jabbed Are Simply as Infectious because the Unvaccinated

COVID jab mandates are much more irrational while you consider the truth that they don’t stop you from being contaminated, and research have repeatedly proven that when you’re contaminated, you may have the identical or increased viral load as unvaccinated people. What which means is you’re simply as infectious as an unvaccinated particular person.

What’s extra, as famous in a letter25 to the editor of The New England Journal of Medication, the pictures even have solely minor affect on viral clearance. When you get the COVID shot and are available down with COVID, you is likely to be sick for a day or so lower than somebody who’s unvaccinated.

We Should Deal with COVID Sufferers Early

McCullough closes out his presentation going over the all-important situation of early remedy. You could deal with COVID early and aggressively. You additionally must hit it from a number of sides. No single drug can successfully deal with all features of this an infection (though the Omicron variant doesn’t seem to have any of the blood clotting and low oxygen points related to the earliest strains).

Only a few folks want die from COVID so long as they get acceptable remedy early sufficient. The truth that our well being authorities are to today refusing to acknowledge profitable remedy protocols is nothing in need of against the law.

If you wish to reside, and if you need your loved ones and buddies to reside, you’d be sensible to disregard the CDC’s and FDA’s suggestion to attend till you’ll be able to’t breathe after which go to the hospital, the place they’ll provide you with poisonous remdesivir and deadly air flow. As an alternative, arm your self with a number of early remedy protocols and be sure to have the fundamentals in your drugs cupboard. Protocols you should use embody:

I reviewed all of those protocols and imagine the FLCCC’s is the simplest and best. I’ve posted a abstract of it under. Nevertheless, I’ve altered a number of the suggestions. Particularly, I like to recommend:

Reducing zinc dose from 100 mg to 50 mg elemental zinc, however just for three days, then lower to fifteen mg elemental zinc.

Rising quercetin from 250 mg to 500 mg.

Add NAC to 500 mg per day.

When utilizing vitamin C, I like to recommend liposomal vitamin C, 1,000 to 2,000 mg, 4 to 6 occasions per day.

When utilizing honey, be certain it’s uncooked, not regular honey from the grocery retailer. Uncooked honey could be obtained on-line or at a well being meals retailer.

Add fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptidase or nattokinase, two to 4 tablets, two to 3 occasions a day, on an empty abdomen (one hour earlier than or two hours after a meal). It will assist break down any microclots and can be utilized in lieu of aspirin.

I’ve additionally added a few therapies that they’ve but to incorporate:

  • Nebulized hydrogen peroxide — Nebulize 5 ml of 0.1% peroxide dissolved in 0.9% regular saline each hour or two. It’s finest to make use of a nebulizer that plugs into the wall, as these are more practical than battery operated ones.
  • Intravenous ozone administered by a educated ozone doctor.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart